When broken strands of DNA get repaired improperly, they can stitch together in new “Frankengene” fusions that can cause cancer.
Researchers from two labs in the Human Biology division at Fred Hutch Cancer Center are working together to better understand how one of these notorious fusions — ZFTA-RELA — drives rare brain tumors in children called ependymomas.
The work, recently published in the journals PNAS and Neuro-Oncology, maps the deep biology of ependymoma tumors, mirrors that biology in a mouse model and reveals a new molecular vulnerability in ZFTA-RELA fusions that could be targeted with drugs.
The discovery is the result of a longstanding collaboration between the labs of rare cancer expert Taran Gujral, PhD, and brain cancer researcher Eric Holland, MD, PhD, who directs the Human Biology Division and holds the Pigott Family Endowed Chair.
Their collaboration showcases innovative methods developed at Fred Hutch that are well suited to overcoming the logistical challenges of studying rare cancers, which typically don’t attract investment from big pharmaceutical companies.
Mapping the deep biology of a rare but scary brain tumor
Ependymomas comprise about 10% of intracranial malignant tumors in children with 30% of cases diagnosed before the age of 3.
Though there are many subtypes of this tumor, they’re all usually treated with surgery and radiotherapy with minimal benefit from chemotherapy.
There’s no specific treatment for a rare, but particularly lethal variety of these tumors that harbor a Frankengene called ZFTA-RELA, which sounds even more intimidating spelled out: Zinc Finger Translocation Associated – RELA Proto-Oncogene.
That’s a common problem for research in rare cancers because there are fewer patient tumor samples to study and fewer genetically engineered preclinical models to study disease progression and response to treatment in living organisms.
Gujral, Holland and their colleagues overcame those hurdles in three steps, starting with an approach pioneered in the Holland Lab that classifies tumors based on their underlying biology rather than their appearance under a microscope.
Holland and Sonali Arora, MS, who runs the computational biology section of his lab, integrated gene expression data from more than 1,200 tumor samples gathered from North America and Europe of two pediatric brain cancers — medulloblastoma and ependymoma.
Using computational tools invented at Fred Hutch, Holland’s team simplified that information, which comprises millions of data points, and represented it graphically on a digital reference map.
But such a map is only useful if it can make fine-grained distinctions between molecular subtypes of tumors. To draw significant contrasts Holland suggested adding data from medulloblastomas so that they were comparing two diseases instead of one.
“That was [Holland’s] brilliant idea because then we could have that contrasting factor,” Arora said. “You want to have stark differences across our map.”
She and Holland and their colleagues analyzed gene expression data for the tumor samples collected in publicly available datasets. That data represented average gene expression across large groups of cells using a method called bulk RNA sequencing.
Another method — single-cell RNA sequencing — analyzes gene expression from individual cells that each receive a unique barcode to track their activity. That method reveals a finer grain of molecular detail than bulk RNA sequencing, but it takes a lot more time, money and complex analysis.
Holland and Arora’s approach showed that bulk RNA sequencing can produce quicker, cheaper, more clinically relevant results on a larger scale without sacrificing the detail needed to trace signaling pathways, biomarkers of disease and potential drug targets.
They performed single-cell RNA sequencing data from 25 individual tumor samples to confirm that they were capturing the deep tumor biology they needed to make a meaningful reference map using the bulk RNA method.