Head-and-neck cancer patients experience less toxicity with proton radiation therapy, per new study
A large clinical study recently published in The Lancet showed that patients treated with proton therapy for oropharyngeal cancers (cancers of the upper throat including the tonsils and back of the tongue) experienced less toxicity than those treated with conventional X-ray radiation.
Radiation therapy combined with chemotherapy is a key treatment approach for head and neck cancers; cancers related to human papilloma virus (HPV) are especially responsive to this approach.
Radiation is also often preferred when tumors are inoperable or if physicians want to avoid invasive surgeries. Radiation can also be a successful tactic following surgery. Adding chemotherapy can improve cancer control and survival by treating the body systemically.
Jay J. Liao, MD, who treats head-and-neck cancer patients at Fred Hutch – Proton Therapy, said this combination has been the standard of care in many patients for about 25 years.
“Many patients are successfully cured; however, these treatments are very intensive and often associated with significant short and long-term toxicities,” Liao said. “Many current efforts are focused on strategies to reduce the side effects of treatment, including the potential for proton beam radiation to lessen treatment intensity by further reducing radiation exposure to normal tissues.”
The landmark study published in The Lancet — a multicenter randomized trial comparing radiation modalities — included researchers from both Fred Hutch and the University of Washington. It was the largest trial completed to date to compare conventional X-ray-based treatment to proton radiation in patients with oropharynx cancers.
The trial, which enrolled Stage 3 and Stage 4 head-and-neck cancer patients from 21 sites, showed very high rates of cancer control and low risk of recurrence with proton beam radiation, which was comparable to X-ray based therapy.
Notably, proton therapy significantly reduced the rates of severe side effects including dry mouth, immune suppression, swallowing problems and feeding tube dependence. This reduction in toxicity in patients treated with protons may also contribute to improved long-term survival five years post treatment.
“Side effects from head and neck radiation can be quite significant both in the short and long term,” Liao said. “This can be influenced by the exact location and extent of the cancer. Many patients are cured of cancer but may deal with major long-term consequences on their voice, swallowing, eating and oral health from these intensive treatments. In this study, proton therapy was shown to maintain high rates of cancer cure, while reducing the toxicity of treatment. It is an important step toward improving the quality of life of our patients after treatment and returning patients closer to their pre-treatment baseline.”
Further analyses from this study will be released in the future with more details on long-term survival outcomes as well as patient-reported health outcomes during and after treatment.
Physicians, including Liao, also plan to evaluate whether additional side effect measures may be improved with proton therapy.
Beyond oropharynx cancers
Given that providers can better direct proton radiation to a solid tumor, Liao and colleagues, Neil Panjwani, MD and Paul Riviere, MD, are using proton radiation to treat a number of different types of head-and-neck cancer beyond oropharynx, such as some cancers of the nasopharynx, nasal cavity and sinuses, salivary glands, base of skull and recurrent cancers.
Many critical organs — the brain, eyes and optic nerves, inner ear, salivary glands, swallowing muscles, jaw and mouth — are all close to each other and can be impacted by any cancer found in the area. The precision of protons can better limit radiation to surrounding healthy tissue.
Another recent study published in the New England Journal of Medicine looked at adding immunotherapy — which uses the body’s own immune system to find and destroy cancer cells — before and after surgery in patients with operable, locally-advanced head and neck cancer. Fred Hutch physicians and researchers are leaders in discovering new ways to harness the immune system to treat cancer.
“This study showed that adding immunotherapy to the standard of treatment — surgery followed by radiation or chemoradiation — has led to a significant improvement in disease-free survival and has ushered in a paradigm shift in the treatment of some patients with surgically-managed head-and-neck cancer,” Liao said. “It’s one of the largest positive trials we’ve seen in a while. Bringing this effectively into clinical practice requires significant multispecialty care coordination.”
Because head-and-neck cancer treatment involves so many steps and careful collaboration among multiple physicians, Fred Hutch recently expanded its head-and-neck cancer multidisciplinary clinic to three full days a week. This allows patients to be seen by the various experts in their care, including the head and neck surgeon, medical oncologist and radiation oncologist, in addition to key support services like speech and swallow therapy and nutrition, all on the same day.
“It’s very patient-centric,” Liao said. “The care team can communicate and work closely together to make complex decisions and deliver multidisciplinary care plans, which may include leading-edge therapies, clinical trials and advanced technologies such as proton beam radiation. This team approach is focused on optimizing the care of our patients in order to provide the best outcomes.”
To learn more about proton therapy for head-and-neck cancers, check out our webpage.
Read more about our other head-and-neck cancer radiation specialists, Neil Panjwani, MD and Paul Riviere, MD.