The team confirmed a causal relationship: deleting USP22 in two independent, highly chemosensitive PDX models made tumors resistant to chemotherapy, with USP22-deleted tumors exhibiting less apoptosis and reduced cell-cycle arrest. In line with this, they found a PDX model (JHU-LX33) that naturally harbors a truncating USP22 mutation and is chemoresistant. Restoring normal USP22 to this tumor re-sensitized it to chemotherapy, while a catalytically dead USP22 mutant failed to restore sensitivity, demonstrating that USP22's enzymatic activity is essential to chemosensitivity.
USP22 normally removes ubiquitin from histone H2A at lysine 119 (H2AK119ub), a repressive mark linked to Polycomb-mediated gene silencing. Without USP22, this mark piles up (along with the repressive mark H3K27me3) at genes controlling neuroendocrine identity, including the master regulator ASCL1 and neuronal genes like NKX2-1, NKX2-2 and SEMA6A. The authors also found decreased expression of these genes after USP22 loss. SCLC's neuroendocrine character is tightly linked to chemosensitivity, so silencing it appears to help tumors dodge the drugs.
Chemotherapy-induced DNA damage signaling was also attenuated in USP22-null tumors. Following cisplatin/etoposide treatment, these tumors showed weaker induction of γH2AX (a phosphorylation event that recruits DNA repair factors to DNA break sites), reduced phosphorylation of proteins downstream of the DNA damage checkpoint kinases ATM/ATR, and lower expression of DNA damage-response genes including BRCA1, CHEK1, and RAD51. These findings indicate that USP22-null tumors mount a diminished DNA damage response following chemotherapy.
USP22-null tumors had increased expression of glycolysis and hypoxia-related genes specifically after chemotherapy treatment—a metabolic shift that's been linked to chemoresistance in other cancers. This turned out to be a crucial susceptibility: inhibiting glycolysis with the GLUT1 inhibitor BAY-876 restored chemotherapy sensitivity in USP22-deleted tumors, boosting DNA damage signaling back to normal levels and shrinking tumors that were otherwise chemoresistant.
“These findings provide new insight into the development of chemoresistance in SCLC and identify the SAGA complex as a potential therapeutic vulnerability for overcoming treatment resistance,” lead author Scott Best shares.
“Our findings raise the broader question of how resistance to chemotherapy arises through mechanisms beyond loss-of-function alterations in small cell lung cancer,” he adds. “Moving forward, our lab will focus on systematically identifying these additional drivers of chemoresistance using orthogonal functional genomics approaches, including in vivo gain-of-function screening. We believe that defining the diverse mechanisms underlying chemoresistance will help uncover new therapeutic vulnerabilities and guide the development of more effective strategies for overcoming chemoresistance in small cell lung cancer.”