The results were pretty interesting and surprising. When people ate just three meals a day, their hunger and fullness signals were more distinct. Ghrelin, the hormone that makes us feel hungry, spiked before meals and dropped afterward — which is what you’d expect if your body is clearly responding to meals. Likewise, the hormone PYY, which signals fullness, rose after meals and then gradually dropped. People also said they felt truly hungry before meals and full after.
But when those same people ate six times a day, their hormone levels showed much smaller fluctuations. Ghrelin levels rose only slightly between meals, and PYY increased only modestly after eating—much smaller shifts compared to the larger fluctuations seen with three big meals. In short, their bodies didn’t seem to recognize the small meals as clearly. Their hunger and fullness ratings showed the same trend: they felt kind of hungry or kind of full most of the day, but never really one or the other.
What’s more, these effects were even stronger for people with higher body fat or BMI. In this group, the body’s response to frequent meals was even more dulled. This suggests that people who struggle with energy balance may be more vulnerable with appetite regulation if they choose to have smaller, frequent meals throughout the day
These findings challenge the long-held belief that more frequent eating is automatically better. In this study, eating three times a day actually seemed to help the body better recognize hunger and satisfaction, which could help prevent overeating in the long run. Of course, everyone’s body is different. Some people may feel better with more frequent meals due to medical conditions, blood sugar issues, or just personal preference. But if you’ve been forcing yourself to eat six times a day because you thought it was the “healthy” thing to do, this research offers a good reason to listen to your own hunger cues instead.