Refinements over the last 10 years in marrow and stem cell transplantation to treat blood cancers significantly reduced the risk of treatment-related complications and death, according to an institutional self-analysis of transplant-patient outcomes conducted at the Hutchinson Center.
Among the major findings of the study, which compared transplant-patient outcomes in the mid-‘90s with those a decade later: After adjusting for factors known to be associated with outcome, the researchers observed a 60 percent reduction in the risk of death within 200 days of transplant and a 41 percent reduction in the risk of overall mortality at any time after transplant.
“Everything we looked at improved a decade after the initial analysis,” said corresponding author Dr. George McDonald of the Clinical Research Division. The paper was published Nov. 25 in the New England Journal of Medicine.
McDonald and colleagues reviewed the outcomes of 1,418 transplant patients who received peripheral-blood stem cells or bone marrow from unrelated donors between 1993 and 1997 and compared them to 1,148 patients who had the same procedures between 2003 and 2007. The malignancies treated included forms of leukemia, lymphoma, multiple myeloma and myelodysplastic syndrome.
The researchers also found that the estimated one-year overall survival rates for both groups were 55 percent and 70 percent, respectively. They also observed statistically significant declines in the risks of severe graft-vs-host disease; infections caused by viruses, bacteria and fungi; and complications caused by lung, kidney and liver damage.
Lead author Dr. Ted Gooley, also of the Clinical Research Division, noted that the analysis presents the findings in terms of the changes in the “risk” or “hazard” of death and transplant complications after taking into account the fact that the patients treated in the mid-2000s were, on average, older and sicker than those who were treated in the mid-1990s.
Clinical practice improvements
McDonald said he and his colleagues could only speculate about the reasons for the improved outcomes because the study was retrospective and was not a randomized comparison of transplant techniques and treatments among groups of patients. However, the authors deemed several changes in clinical practices to be important in risk reduction, many of which were the result of ongoing clinical research (including various randomized clinical trials) conducted at the Center and at other major transplant centers around the world:
“This research and the improved outcomes are the result of a team approach to one of the most complex procedures in medicine,” said McDonald, referring to the care of patients by oncologists and specialists in infectious diseases, pulmonary and critical care medicine, nephrology, gastroenterology and hepatology, and by highly skilled nurses and support staff.
“Each of these programs is involved in ongoing clinical research into the complications of transplant, which results in constant changes in how transplantation is carried out,” he said. “These data show clearly that our collective efforts have improved the chances of long-term survival for our patients.”
The study was supported by grants from the National Institutes of Health.
Every dollar counts. Please support lifesaving research today.