Next, they treated a culture of B. fragilis with Bf12P1 and collected the cells just before phage-induced death could occur. RNA sequencing showed that the phage-treated bacteria separated into two clusters. One cluster contained phage transcripts (the “infected cluster”), and the other contained no phage transcripts (the “uninfected cluster”). To understand transcriptional changes in B. fragilis upon infection, they filtered out the phage transcripts. They found that infected bacteria had more RNA polymerase, replication proteins, and ribonucleoside reductase transcripts compared to uninfected cells. All of these changes are expected and reflect a natural host response to viral infections, but the expression data is from bacteria at all stages of the infection cycle, limiting the resolution of this data.
To gain insights into how the infection timepoint impacted transcriptional changes, the team constructed a pseudotime trajectory for their samples. Pseudotime assigns each cell a value between 0 and 1 based on how similar the transcripts in a particular bacterium are to those in another bacterium. In this case, a pseudotime value of 0 would represent the earliest stage of infection, and a pseudotime value of 1 would represent the latest stage of infection. They found that the frequency of transcripts from B. fragilis decreased at higher pseudotime values as phage transcripts increased. In early pseudotime, B. fragilis expressed genes encoding transcription and translation machinery. In mid pseudotime, gene expression shifted towards dNTP synthesis, likely to promote phage replication. In late pseudotime, bacteria expressed genes indicating the cells were damaged and likely to die. Together, this approach indicates that pseudotime can effectively separate bacteria at different stages of infection and provide valuable insights into the genetic changes that happen over the course of infection.
Dey and Kuchina also wanted to understand how CPS genes regulated susceptibility to phage. CPS subtypes are encoded by 8 operons termed PSA-H that form distinct structures to help bacteria resist phage. CPS genes were differentially expressed between infected and uninfected bacteria. Uninfected B. fragilis had higher expression of PSB, PSF, and PSG, suggesting that these CPS types may protect phage from infection. They calculated phage infection chances based on CPS expression and found that PSB and PSG-expressing bacteria were least likely to succumb to infection, while PSA, PSC, PSE, and PSH-expressing bacteria were most likely to be infected. They tested this prediction in the lab by infecting B. fragilis that only expressed either PSA, PSC, PSG, or PSH with their phage. In line with their prediction, PSG-only bacteria were resistant to phage killing, while PSA, PSC, and PSH-only bacteria were quickly eliminated by the phage. Together, these results show that CPS subtype underlies B. fragilis susceptibility to phage.
Overall, Dey and Kuchina demonstrated that bacterial single-cell RNA sequencing can be used to understand phage-bacteria interactions, model the cycle of phage infections, and dissect differences in phage response within a single species of bacteria. This work paves the way for designing phage therapies that could treat bacterial infections and prevent bacterial resistance.