The choice to profile male and female animals was very intentional. Prior to this work, there was much debate in the field on whether the same glial cell had different functions in men and women. Profiling glia from the two sexes could have important implication for understanding human disease. Singhvi highlights that the occurrence of neurological disorders varies highly between women and men. For example, men are twice as likely to develop Parkinson’s, and women are more likely to develop Alzheimer’s. This high-throughput approach to characterizing glia across sexes could give researchers new insights into molecular regulators of glial function.
Once the pair had isolated and sequenced the RNA of all C. elegans glia, they encountered an analysis problem. Typically, RNA sequencing data is clustered according to which cells express similar transcripts. These clusters are then named based on which transcripts are present or absent. For most cell types, decades of literature have established which genes distinguish them from other cell types, but this in-depth analysis simply does not yet exist for glial cells. “In this context, we did not have that kind of literature base because the glial cells are so understudied in general,” says Singhvi, “when you go in completely unbiased into a field, how do you derive meaning from the atlas you created?”
The answer came from Singhvi’s collaboration with Setty. Setty’s team was able to create a new analysis tool called PairDEx. Existing computational methods to cluster cells based on which genes they express are generally good at identifying which cells express which genes, but they are unable to determine if a particular gene is specific to a particular type of cell. “If you want to do any in vivo experiments, you want to know which genes are expressed and which genes are specifically expressed in a given cell type,” says Setty. In other words, for any follow up work to be guided by their single-cell atlas, they needed to be able to tie specific glial cells to a molecular signature. “Existing tools do well, but they don’t necessarily guarantee you specificity of expression. When you compare one cell type to others, you get a bunch of genes that are [expressed differently] in this cell type, but not specific to the cell type,” explains Setty. Instead of comparing one cluster to all other cells, PairDEx compares one cluster to all of the other clusters, one by one. This approach allows researchers to rank the genes that are specific to a particular glial cell type.
Once the team had their glial molecular signatures in hand, they validated their findings extensively in vivo. As predicted, they were able to identify different molecular signatures between male and female animals. Outside of the sex differences, they identified the expression of a molecule called NLP-16 in glial cells. NLP-16 is a member of an important family of signaling molecule in the brain called neuropeptides. While the glial cells produced NLP-16, they lacked the machinery that neurons typically use to release neuropeptides into the brain. This suggests that there are other release mechanisms for neuropeptides in glia that researchers have not yet identified. This is one surprising finding, but the team anticipates many more to come. They published their atlas for other researchers to interrogate, and this resource is already pushing science forward across institutions. Since the atlas was published, many scientists have reached out to tell the team that this resource helped them gain insights into targets that were previously dead ends. “I’m hoping that it spurs more people to have the resources to do what they need to do,” says Singhvi.