With this model, the authors didn’t need to account for gp350 and gp42 binding to the murine B cells, since the murine version of their receptors don’t bind those glycoproteins. However, the antibody repertoire generated by these mice is entirely human, allowing the authors to screen for human antibodies that target gp350 and gp42.
The authors began by immunizing the ATX-GK mice with recombinant glycoproteins gp350 and gp42. In collaboration with the Antibody Technology Shared Resource, they harvested splenic B cells from the mice post-immunization and combined them with myeloma cells to generate hybridomas, which are long-lived, immortalized cells that produce massive amounts of monoclonal antibodies.
From the hybridoma cultures, they isolated 2 antibodies targeting gp350 and 8 antibodies targeting gp42. They performed binding assays to screen for the most potent binders and neutralization assays to determine which of these antibodies could block EBV infection in (human) epithelial and B cells. They found that their human antibodies were just as potent at blocking EBV infection as the mouse mAb previously used in clinical trials.
In collaboration with the Pancera Lab in VIDD, the then authors performed structural analyses of their most potent mAbs to characterize binding between antibody and antigen. They found that both gp350-targeting antibodies (ATX-350-1 and -2) block gp350 binding to the complement receptor, and two of the gp42-targeting antibodies (ATX-42-2 and -1.1) could block gp42 binding to HLA.
Dr. Chhan and colleagues then asked: how well do these antibodies protect against EBV in vivo? To answer this, they needed a mouse model of EBV infection. Not just any mouse can serve as this model, as another complication of EBV is that it is highly specific to humans.
They therefore switched to another humanized mouse system to model EBV infection. In this system, the mice are highly immunodeficient until they are engrafted with human CD34+ cord blood cells, which confer susceptibility to EBV.
"Some of the mice we used for evaluating the mabs in challenge studies were provided by the Kiem lab," says Dr. McGuire, highlighting an example of productive collaboration across Fred Hutch Divisions.
After transplant, the mice recovered for 8 weeks before injection with either ATX-350-2 or ATX-42-2 mAbs and subsequent infection with EBV. They found that the ATX-42-2 antibody potently blocked EBV infection in the spleen, but that the ATX-gp350-2 mAb only partially protected the animals from EBV infection. They suspect this may be because gp350 is not required for infection of human B cells.
The next steps of this project will focus on improving the pharmacokinetics and dosing regimen of these therapeutic mAbs rather than the single injection used in this study. The authors are also interested in combining these mAbs to improve protection through additive or synergistic mechanisms.
“These mAbs contribute to filling the gap of the very small number of genetically human mAbs against EBV’s surface glycoprotein gp42 and gp350,” Dr. Chhan concludes.
In the bigger picture, the lab is excited by the potential of the ATX-GK mouse model to rapidly discover antibodies against a wide range of human pathogens.
“The use of humanized mice to generate these mAbs offer a quick pipeline to generate genetically human mAbs with high potency that could be applicable to other diseases,” says Dr. Chhan.
This publication was also featured by the Fred Hutch News Service. Click here to check out their story.