Photo by Robert Hood / Fred Hutch News Service
Editor's note: This story was first published on Oct. 11, 2017 and has been updated to reflect a presentation at the annual meeting of the American Society of Hematology on Dec. 11.
New research from teams at Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center provide the most comprehensive data yet reported on side effects of the emerging cancer immunotherapy strategy known as CAR T-cell therapy.
Based on their data from 133 adult participants in one clinical trial, the researchers identified potential biomarkers associated with the development of the toxic effects, known as cytokine release syndrome and neurotoxicity. They also created algorithms aimed at identifying the rare patients whose symptoms were most likely to turn life-threatening.
On Monday, Dr. Cameron Turtle of Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center presented the researchers’ data on neurotoxicity at the annual meeting of the American Society of Hematology. Turtle and colleagues also published their findings on neurotoxicity and cytokine release syndrome earlier this year.
The researchers anticipate that their work could eventually help doctors reduce the risk of the severe side effects and occasional deaths, which have been seen in clinical trials of various CAR T-cell products. They said that their findings will need to be tested and improved upon by further study, and they noted that their results arise from a clinical trial of one particular CAR T-cell product, which is made by and at Fred Hutch.
“It’s essential that we understand the potential side effects of CAR T therapies,” said Turtle, who led the research. “While use of these cell therapies is likely to dramatically increase because they’ve been so effective in patients with resistant or refractory B-cell malignancies, there is still much to learn.”
Detailed studies improve understanding of toxic side effects
The product studied by the Fred Hutch team, like the products recently approved by the FDA, reprograms patients’ immune cells to kill blood cancer cells bearing a protein called CD19. The 133 participants in the Fred Hutch clinical trial — believed to be the largest sample size in any published study of CAR T-cell therapy side effects — had advanced leukemias or lymphomas that had proven resistant to standard therapies. Over the last two years, Fred Hutch researchers reported results from different groups of patients treated with the optimal regimen of chemotherapy and CAR T cells: 93 percent of participants with B-cell acute lymphoblastic leukemia went into complete remission; 64 percent with non-Hodgkin lymphoma experienced complete remission; and 86 percent of a subset of patients with high-risk chronic lymphocytic leukemia cleared disease from their bone marrow.
“These patients had highly resistant, refractory disease,” Turtle said. “For many of them, it was their last option.”
In two recent papers and in Monday's presentation at ASH, the researchers provide detailed descriptions of the clinical courses of cytokine release syndrome and of neurotoxicity in study participants, including the types of symptoms present, the timing of their occurrence and the course they ran to resolution. The neurotoxicity paper also includes detailed data from imaging and pathological studies. The ASH presentation follows up on team’s paper on neurotoxicity that was published online in Cancer Discovery Oct. 12. Their paper on cytokine release syndrome, or CRS, was published online in the journal Blood Sept. 18. The findings show that in the vast majority of patients (about 95 percent of participants) harms were either reversible or did not occur; however, as previously reported, complications of CRS, neurotoxicity or both were fatal for some participants.
Photo by Robert Hood
One of the studies’ novel findings is that severe cases of both types of toxicities were associated with signs that endothelial cells — those lining blood vessels — were ramping up activity in response to injury. For example, the team found that the normally tight barrier between the blood and the brain had broken down in some patients with severe neurotoxicity, and cytokines and CAR T cells from the blood had entered the fluid bathing the brain. The researchers say that biomarkers for endothelial activation could help identify which patients are at greatest risk of CRS and neurotoxicity.
“It appears that cytokine release syndrome is probably necessary for most cases of severe neurotoxicity, but in terms of what triggers a person with cytokine release syndrome to get neurotoxicity — that’s something we need to investigate further,” said Dr. Kevin Hay, a research fellow at Fred Hutch and a lead author of both papers.
As the clinical trial progressed, the study investigators adjusted their CAR T-cell dosing strategy. This change appears to correspond with a reduction in the frequency of the most serious forms of these toxic effects, though more research is needed to confirm this.
In treating clinical trial participants at Seattle Cancer Care Alliance, Fred Hutch’s clinical care partner, the researchers also developed methods for monitoring and treating toxicities, as reported in these two papers and the ASH presentation. Those methods enable study participants to receive the preparatory chemotherapy and subsequent CAR T-cell infusion as outpatients. Patients are admitted into the hospital if they spike a high fever in the days following the infusion.
“We have come a long way in understanding what these toxicity events are,” Hay said. “That’s really what these two papers demonstrate.”
Identifying risk factors for cytokine release syndrome
The symptoms of CRS include high fevers and low blood pressure. CRS developed in 93 of the 133 trial participants studied. In most of these patients, it resolved on its own with no treatment. But 10 patients, most of whom were treated early in the trial, developed the most serious symptoms (grade 4 or 5).
The researchers identified five independent factors relating to participants’ baseline health status upon trial enrollment and to variation within the experimental treatment itself, such as cell dose, which predicted patients’ risk of developing CRS of any grade. Using that information, they developed a two-part method to identify the patients who would go on to develop severe CRS. Within the first day and a half after T-cell infusion, the red flags were a fever of at least 102 degrees Fahrenheit and high levels of one particular immune-signaling chemical, a cytokine known as MCP-1. The algorithm was relevant to all three cancer types included in the trial.
While an effective therapy for CRS is FDA-approved — a cytokine-modulating drug and/or a steroid — it is unclear what the best protocol is for early intervention in the development of side effects. The data from their study could inform the design of a clinical trial to test the best strategy for blunting the development of the most serious cases, the researchers say.
Clues to neurotoxicity
Neurotoxicity, which occurred after CAR T-cell infusion in 53 of the 133 trial participants, is an umbrella term that encompasses a wide range of neurological symptoms. The most common type of neurologic side effect was delirium with maintained alertness (35 patients), the team reported. Other manifestations of neurotoxicity included headache, problems speaking, a decrease in consciousness and, rarely, seizures (four patients) or coma (six patients). A total of seven patients experienced life-threatening neurotoxicity.
The researchers identified several pre-existing factors that were associated with a higher risk of developing any level of neurotoxicity, such as patient age and cancer type. Only CAR T-cell dose was associated with later risk of developing the most serious neurotoxicity.
The team found that fever of at least 102 degrees Fahrenheit and high levels of two cytokines (IL-6 and MCP-1) in the first 36 hours after CAR T-cell infusion could identify, with high accuracy, those patients who would go on to develop life-threatening neurotoxicity.
There are no data that point toward the best treatment for neurologic toxicities of CAR T-cell therapy, and there are not yet any validated laboratory models to use for research to clearly elucidate their causes. The researchers hope that their comprehensive data provide a springboard for research teams to delve into their causes and best treatments.
Talk about this story on Facebook.
This research was funded by the National Institutes of Health; Juno Therapeutics Inc.; the Life Science Discovery Fund; the Bezos family; and institutional funds from Bloodworks Northwest.
Fred Hutch, where Turtle, Hay and several other co-authors are employed, has a financial interest in Juno and receives licensing and other payments from the company. The Hutch has pending patent applications that could be licensed by nonprofit institutions and for-profit companies, including Juno. For additional disclosure information about the authors, please see the papers.
Are you interested in reprinting or republishing this story? Be our guest! We want to help connect people with the information they need. We just ask that you link back to the original article, preserve the author’s byline and refrain from making edits that alter the original context. Questions? Email us at email@example.com
For information about participating in a cancer clinical trial, please contact Fred Hutch’s clinical care partner, Seattle Cancer Care Alliance, or email firstname.lastname@example.org. Another good resource about clinical trials is the National Cancer Institute’s Contact Center, which can be reached at 1.800.4.CANCER. The phone line is staffed from 8 a.m. to 8 p.m. ET Monday through Friday.